|
|
|
|
|
|
Parks Victoria threaten top fisheries - Jim Harmon
|
 |
|
It is no secret to anglers that Parks Victoria appears to be anti-angling. However, some years ago I found out that it’s not anglers specifically; it can be anyone who uses ‘their’ parks.
When I started fishing in the Yarra for native fish decades ago, whenever I went to one of my favourite spots of a summer weekend it was always frequented by 50 to 150 people—families picnicking, youngsters being taught to fish—people having fun by the water. Then Parks Victoria decided that this was detrimental to the area and fenced it off about a kilometre from the river. Since then the only people I have seen there are dedicated anglers who are willing to put up with the walk over two very steep hills and Parks Victoria officers who drive in—apparently their vehicles don’t do any ‘damage’.
However, when their latest plans and tactics came to my attention my already low opinion of them sank even further!
Does your favourite river or lake appear on this list?
Big River
|
Jamieson River
|
Mitta Mitta River
|
Buckland River
|
Kiewa River
|
Ovens River
|
Bundara River
|
King River
|
Rose River
|
Cobungra River
|
Lake Catani
|
Snowy River
|
Dandongadale River
|
Lake Dartmouth
|
Tanjil River
|
Dargo River
|
Lake William Hovell
|
Wellington River
|
Gibbo River
|
Lake Tarli Karng
|
Wongungarra River
|
Howqua River
|
Macalister River
|
Wonnangatta River
|
For most Victorian freshwater fishers—and even many from interstate—the answer is probably yes. All these waters flow through or lie in a national park and will be subject to the new management plan being developed by Parks Victoria; a plan and process that has alarmed anglers everywhere.
First, there was the timing of advertising for the advisory committee positions for the review of this plan. Parks Victoria chose Christmas Eve 2008 to advertise on their website for the committee, followed by an inconspicuous advert mid-holidays (10 January) in the Herald Sun. If anyone stumbled upon these ads, they were informed they had until just the end of the school holidays (27 January 2009) to apply. Not surprisingly, this whole ‘process’ apparently went unnoticed by any stakeholder not first alerted to the positions by Parks Victoria.
Extraordinarily, even the government’s own Fisheries Victoria was left out of the loop.
On its own, all this is troubling enough, but things get downright worrying when you consider the new management plan has the potential to ban recreational fishing for the first time in the 150 year history of Victorian National Parks.
It works like this: the developing management plan can divide a park up into zones: zones for recreational activities, zones for conservation, zones that are mixed, zones for recreation development and last but not least, wilderness. These zones along with their permissible activities are then drawn on a map. So now you have a map with areas that let you know what can take place.
The devil is always in the detail. You might find that someone has decided recreational fishing is not considered a low impact activity in the park you’re visiting. So whilst you can throw a line in at the camping spot in a recreational zone, you may not be allowed to fish your special spot in the conservation zone. And what about throwing on the pack and heading off into a wilderness zone?
If fishing doesn’t fit, suddenly it’s prohibited. Or if it does fit, but then another zone is applied it isn’t again. Confused? It could be your favourite bass water on the Snowy River or your favourite trout water on the upper Mitta Mitta—if it’s zoned out, it’s gone forever.
Freshwater angling in Victoria hasn’t seen a threat like it. The loss of even a part of one water from the list in this editorial would be a catastrophe.
As we go to press, Parks Victoria has acknowledged their failure in adequately notifying key stakeholders like recreational fishers about the new management plan, and it appears they are belatedly making provisions for recreational angling representation. However, there has never been a more potent sense of Parks Victoria as an organisation that keeps ‘managing out’ recreational fishing. Whether this push originates with the responsible minister, the Hon. Gavin Jennings, mid-level bureaucrats or green fundamentalists with the ear of Parks Victoria, we simply don’t know.
So on the one hand, we have a government that applauds the economic and social benefits of recreational fishing, and promises better fishing access and opportunities. A government whose pre-election policies criticised the Greens for their ‘…extreme position on fishing which… advocates locking people out of many good fishing spots.’and ‘…go(ing) too far in backing absolute bans on recreational activities in parks.’Yet it seems the same government may simultaneously be overseeing a process that could inflict the worst damage to Victoria’s recreational fishing in living memory.
There is a reason recreational fishing has always been permitted in National Parks here and elsewhere in the world: it is a licensed, regulated activity with a low environmental impact. It is therefore surely time for ministerial intervention to halt Parks Victoria’s ever more frequent and unjustified attacks on angling in the face of the expressed position of the Brumby Government.
At the same time, recreational anglers must band together as never before to fight Parks Victoria’s anti-fishing push. We need to ensure that recreational fishing achieves the status it deserves as a low impact activity compatible with any national park zoning. Meanwhile, keep up to date with what’s happening by visiting the websites of VRFish, Futurefish Foundation and the Australian Trout Foundation. Write to your local state MPs demanding that common sense prevail and recreational fishing be recognised once and for all as an activity permitted in all parts of our national parks.
Article generously provided by:

It is no secret to anglers that Parks Victoria appears to be anti-angling. However, some years ago I found out that it’s not anglers specifically; it can be anyone who uses ‘their’ parks.
When I started fishing in the Yarra for native fish decades ago, whenever I went to one of my favourite spots of a summer weekend it was always frequented by 50 to 150 people—families picnicking, youngsters being taught to fish—people having fun by the water. Then Parks Victoria decided that this was detrimental to the area and fenced it off about a kilometre from the river. Since then the only people I have seen there are dedicated anglers who are willing to put up with the walk over two very steep hills and Parks Victoria officers who drive in—apparently their vehicles don’t do any ‘damage’.
However, when their latest plans and tactics came to my attention my already low opinion of them sank even further!
Does your favourite river or lake appear on this list?
Big River
|
Jamieson River
|
Mitta Mitta River
|
Buckland River
|
Kiewa River
|
Ovens River
|
Bundara River
|
King River
|
Rose River
|
Cobungra River
|
Lake Catani
|
Snowy River
|
Dandongadale River
|
Lake Dartmouth
|
Tanjil River
|
Dargo River
|
Lake William Hovell
|
Wellington River
|
Gibbo River
|
Lake Tarli Karng
|
Wongungarra River
|
Howqua River
|
Macalister River
|
Wonnangatta River
|
For most Victorian freshwater fishers—and even many from interstate—the answer is probably yes. All these waters flow through or lie in a national park and will be subject to the new management plan being developed by Parks Victoria; a plan and process that has alarmed anglers everywhere.
First, there was the timing of advertising for the advisory committee positions for the review of this plan. Parks Victoria chose Christmas Eve 2008 to advertise on their website for the committee, followed by an inconspicuous advert mid-holidays (10 January) in the Herald Sun. If anyone stumbled upon these ads, they were informed they had until just the end of the school holidays (27 January 2009) to apply. Not surprisingly, this whole ‘process’ apparently went unnoticed by any stakeholder not first alerted to the positions by Parks Victoria.
Extraordinarily, even the government’s own Fisheries Victoria was left out of the loop.
On its own, all this is troubling enough, but things get downright worrying when you consider the new management plan has the potential to ban recreational fishing for the first time in the 150 year history of Victorian National Parks.
It works like this: the developing management plan can divide a park up into zones: zones for recreational activities, zones for conservation, zones that are mixed, zones for recreation development and last but not least, wilderness. These zones along with their permissible activities are then drawn on a map. So now you have a map with areas that let you know what can take place.
The devil is always in the detail. You might find that someone has decided recreational fishing is not considered a low impact activity in the park you’re visiting. So whilst you can throw a line in at the camping spot in a recreational zone, you may not be allowed to fish your special spot in the conservation zone. And what about throwing on the pack and heading off into a wilderness zone?
If fishing doesn’t fit, suddenly it’s prohibited. Or if it does fit, but then another zone is applied it isn’t again. Confused? It could be your favourite bass water on the Snowy River or your favourite trout water on the upper Mitta Mitta—if it’s zoned out, it’s gone forever.
Freshwater angling in Victoria hasn’t seen a threat like it. The loss of even a part of one water from the list in this editorial would be a catastrophe.
As we go to press, Parks Victoria has acknowledged their failure in adequately notifying key stakeholders like recreational fishers about the new management plan, and it appears they are belatedly making provisions for recreational angling representation. However, there has never been a more potent sense of Parks Victoria as an organisation that keeps ‘managing out’ recreational fishing. Whether this push originates with the responsible minister, the Hon. Gavin Jennings, mid-level bureaucrats or green fundamentalists with the ear of Parks Victoria, we simply don’t know.
So on the one hand, we have a government that applauds the economic and social benefits of recreational fishing, and promises better fishing access and opportunities. A government whose pre-election policies criticised the Greens for their ‘…extreme position on fishing which… advocates locking people out of many good fishing spots.’and ‘…go(ing) too far in backing absolute bans on recreational activities in parks.’Yet it seems the same government may simultaneously be overseeing a process that could inflict the worst damage to Victoria’s recreational fishing in living memory.
There is a reason recreational fishing has always been permitted in National Parks here and elsewhere in the world: it is a licensed, regulated activity with a low environmental impact. It is therefore surely time for ministerial intervention to halt Parks Victoria’s ever more frequent and unjustified attacks on angling in the face of the expressed position of the Brumby Government.
At the same time, recreational anglers must band together as never before to fight Parks Victoria’s anti-fishing push. We need to ensure that recreational fishing achieves the status it deserves as a low impact activity compatible with any national park zoning. Meanwhile, keep up to date with what’s happening by visiting the websites of VRFish, Futurefish Foundation and the Australian Trout Foundation. Write to your local state MPs demanding that common sense prevail and recreational fishing be recognised once and for all as an activity permitted in all parts of our national parks.
Article generously provided by:

|
|
|
|
Fishing the Environmental Flow.
Environmentalists cop a fair bit of flack for one reason or another and I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t always agree with the path that some take. But to give credit where it’s due there have been many
good outcomes resulting from environmental improvements.
In the ledger of checks and balances with the construction of the Snowy Scheme the many productive water storages provided an excellent fishery. On the minus side, to a degree, many streams and rivers lost their natural flow with water levels decreased to the detriment of a healthy river system.
Of recent time an “environmental flow” has been allocated to boost the health of some waterways and the results have proven very productive in some areas.
Earlier this year the Snowy’s played host to a gathering of Flylife Forumites and I had the pleasure of their company over a few days. As most states in Australia were represented the people who had some experience flyfishing the area were asked to part with some of their local knowledge to assist the visitors. Being mid-summer and the catchment having long suffered drought conditions it wasn’t at all easy to assign them to an area or stretch of water that would prove to be reasonably productive. Some travelled long distances for only fair results, others enjoyed an outing to some small pondage or often fished streams closer to base, most catching smaller fish and occasionally sighting or even hooking up with a larger specimen.
However there was one stretch of water that exceeded the expectations of all who fished it. Once a free flowing stream with long gliding pools emptying into faster shallow runs, little rocky riffles feeding cold oxygenated water into deep holes. But for many years now its flow had been restricted, instead becoming a series of silted weed choked holes, fed by seepage, small springs and rainwater run off. Quality fish were still present but they had become a real challenge, seldom moving far from cover, except at night and restricted to the confines of the pool.
Add an environmental flow. Not copious amounts of water but sufficient to alter the structure of the stream. Fish that previously cruised still water seeking nourishment now able to hold station in ambush of any morsel drifting past. Weed choked sections giving way to the influx of water, sleek bodies now able to explore further afield. In a short space of time the dynamics of the stream had changed, breathing new life into a beautiful ribbon of water. I had often passed by and my thoughts would drift back to what may have been without the offending upstream structure. Now the promise of what may have been was becoming a reality. Although I hadn’t explored a lot of the downstream area I encouraged the visitors to give it a try.
The results were spectacular. Grasshoppers were abundant and any fly imitating these terrestrials was readily taken. Dry flies and nymphs also accounted for a number of beautifully marked browns and the occasional rainbow. One particular day our group included a couple of West Australians, South Australians, Taswegians and a Victorian. We paired off and each fished a section of the stream, all catching and releasing many fish, some with personal bests, everyone agreeing it had been one of their most memorable outings.
 
I have returned a couple of times since and although much cooler and the terrestrials were few to be seen, the fishing was no less exciting. Few people have ventured into this place thus far and therefore the fishing pressure has not tended to have had a noticeable influence as yet. But as is the way this will probably change as more become aware. In the meantime I will toast the environmentalists and enjoy what I have discovered whilst I am able. Roll on next season.
Russ Davies.
Fishing the Environmental Flow.
Environmentalists cop a fair bit of flack for one reason or another and I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t always agree with the path that some take. But to give credit where it’s due there have been many
good outcomes resulting from environmental improvements.
In the ledger of checks and balances with the construction of the Snowy Scheme the many productive water storages provided an excellent fishery. On the minus side, to a degree, many streams and rivers lost their natural flow with water levels decreased to the detriment of a healthy river system.
Of recent time an “environmental flow” has been allocated to boost the health of some waterways and the results have proven very productive in some areas.
Earlier this year the Snowy’s played host to a gathering of Flylife Forumites and I had the pleasure of their company over a few days. As most states in Australia were represented the people who had some experience flyfishing the area were asked to part with some of their local knowledge to assist the visitors. Being mid-summer and the catchment having long suffered drought conditions it wasn’t at all easy to assign them to an area or stretch of water that would prove to be reasonably productive. Some travelled long distances for only fair results, others enjoyed an outing to some small pondage or often fished streams closer to base, most catching smaller fish and occasionally sighting or even hooking up with a larger specimen.
However there was one stretch of water that exceeded the expectations of all who fished it. Once a free flowing stream with long gliding pools emptying into faster shallow runs, little rocky riffles feeding cold oxygenated water into deep holes. But for many years now its flow had been restricted, instead becoming a series of silted weed choked holes, fed by seepage, small springs and rainwater run off. Quality fish were still present but they had become a real challenge, seldom moving far from cover, except at night and restricted to the confines of the pool.
Add an environmental flow. Not copious amounts of water but sufficient to alter the structure of the stream. Fish that previously cruised still water seeking nourishment now able to hold station in ambush of any morsel drifting past. Weed choked sections giving way to the influx of water, sleek bodies now able to explore further afield. In a short space of time the dynamics of the stream had changed, breathing new life into a beautiful ribbon of water. I had often passed by and my thoughts would drift back to what may have been without the offending upstream structure. Now the promise of what may have been was becoming a reality. Although I hadn’t explored a lot of the downstream area I encouraged the visitors to give it a try.
The results were spectacular. Grasshoppers were abundant and any fly imitating these terrestrials was readily taken. Dry flies and nymphs also accounted for a number of beautifully marked browns and the occasional rainbow. One particular day our group included a couple of West Australians, South Australians, Taswegians and a Victorian. We paired off and each fished a section of the stream, all catching and releasing many fish, some with personal bests, everyone agreeing it had been one of their most memorable outings.
 
I have returned a couple of times since and although much cooler and the terrestrials were few to be seen, the fishing was no less exciting. Few people have ventured into this place thus far and therefore the fishing pressure has not tended to have had a noticeable influence as yet. But as is the way this will probably change as more become aware. In the meantime I will toast the environmentalists and enjoy what I have discovered whilst I am able. Roll on next season.
Russ Davies.
|
|
|
|
|
|